• 11/09/2026
  • Article

Transformation: Why new habits determine success

Process engineering is under pressure as never before. The sector is facing several far-reaching changes simultaneously. At the “Future of Processing” special forum, four managing directors explained how they are safeguarding their companies’ competitiveness and navigating the transformation. Johannes Schmid-Wiedersheim from VDMA set the scene with a keynote speech.

Written by Dr. Ulla Reutner

The five participants in the “Future of Processing” Special Forum in front of the Expert Forum stage.
Dr Urs Herding and Fabian Schünke from Herding Filtertechnik, Lukas Zimmermann (AZO), Johannes Schmid-Wiedersheim from VDMA and Rainer Zimmermann from AZO (from left) used presentations and a panel discussion to illustrate how the mechanical engineering sector can operate successfully whilst facing pressure to change.

Premiere at POWTECH TECHNOPHARM. For the first time, a block of presentations at the Expert Forum was not devoted to a technical topic. The well-attended ‘Future of Processing’ Special Forum was organised against the backdrop of growing competitive pressure on the European mechanical engineering sector. Two best-practice presentations by renowned exhibitors highlighted opportunities and viable approaches for reorganising industrial value creation.

Cautious hope is emerging, said Johannes Schmid-Wiedersheim in his keynote address, referring to the latest economic figures. He has been Managing Director of the VDMA’s Process Engineering Machinery and Equipment Association since April. “Exports of process engineering machinery and equipment from Germany rose by 4.9 per cent in the first half of 2026. Business with China developed particularly well.”

Man on stage in front of a flipchart.
Johannes Schmid-Wiedersheim, Managing Director of the VDMA’s Process Machinery and Equipment Association, outlined the key areas of focus for a sustainable process machinery sector.

VDMA: Three areas of action for sustainable process engineering

He identified three areas of action for a sustainable process engineering sector: digitalisation, flexible production, and sustainability. Schmid-Wiedersheim framed these as three key questions:

  1. “Who will run the plant in future?” What role does AI play in smart plants, and where must limits be set? Aspects of security and rights to plant data also need to be clarified. To this end, mechanical engineering firms must develop expertise in analytics, digital twins and much more. A smart plant does not replace a process engineer; it merely makes that knowledge industrially scalable.
  2. “What is the significance of the shift from batch to continuous processes?” Whilst batch production is by no means obsolete, producers must find the “right mix” where it makes sense. For continuous, modular plants and flexible process chains, mechanical engineers must master the interfaces – mechanical, digital and in control technology. In future, therefore, it will not be an individual machine that stands out, but rather the party that best masters the entire process chain.
  3. “How can a zero-loss plant be achieved?” The plant of the future should lose as little as possible: product, energy, quality, safety, and availability. Particular attention is being paid to energy as a key process parameter, as well as to the additional challenge posed by fluctuating raw materials (e.g. biomaterials). The greatest potential for innovation lies at the interfaces – precisely where such products are lost.

“The mechanical engineering sector increasingly sees itself as a process expert rather than as a manufacturer of equipment and plants,” summarised Schmid-Wiedersheim. “The future of mechanical and plant engineering for the pharmaceutical and chemical industries lies in systems that intelligently manage processes, are flexible in production and consistently prevent losses.”

Herding Filtertechnik: The primacy of value creation and the art of omission

So how are VDMA members tackling these challenges? What does transformation mean to them? For the managing directors of Herding Filtertechnik, Dr Urs Herding and Fabian Schünke, creating value for the customer is the top priority. In doing so, the two do not place the technology or a transformation driven by tools at the centre of their approach. Rather, their focus lies on how they, as managers, think about their company.

For them, the art of letting things go comes first. “Every day, managing directors hear about all the things they’re supposed to do: the next tool, the next initiative, the next programme. What we actually need to do is to build really good filtration systems for our customers,” says Urs Herding. Fabian Schünke adds: “Focusing on creating value for customers must be the starting point – in day-to-day business, but also when it comes to innovation, that is, creating value for the future.” The role of management, he says, is to establish that focus for the organisation and to define what does not form part of it. “We call this the primacy of value creation,” emphasises Herding.

In this context, the managing directors have identified two pitfalls:

  1. The pitfall of process illusion: there is not always a causal link between input and output where work can be mapped out according to fixed rules, as is the case in mass production. A good engineering idea, for example, tends to emerge rather through debate and discussion. “We must legitimise this world too,” says Herding, “by bringing the right people together and giving them the freedom to operate, rather than squeezing them into rigid milestones and reporting loops.”
  2. The mindset pitfall: Sometimes one gets the impression that an employee is not acting logically. Schünke describes a pattern familiar to many companies: “A sales representative fails to coordinate with the design team, even though both want to produce something good. People are quick to say: ‘He doesn’t think like an entrepreneur; we need to tackle his mindset.’” Yet it is the context above all that shapes behaviour: targets, incentive schemes or areas of responsibility that cause everyone to focus solely on their own remit. “If cooperation is a prerequisite for innovation, then it is management’s job to legitimise and organise collaboration, rather than tinkering with the attitudes of individuals,” says Schünke.

At the end of their presentation, both noted that transformation is never complete. However, they found it helpful to discuss the issues outlined at management level.

A man is describing and drawing on a flipchart, depicting a stylised factory, etc. To the right, another man is gesturing.
Dr Urs Herding (right) and Fabian Schünke from Herding gave a particularly lively explanation of how they are preparing their company for this transformation.
A man speaking on stage in front of a presentation slide.
AZO CEO Rainer Zimmermann had already initiated the shift away from hierarchical corporate management back in 2018.

AZO: Those affected become stakeholders – and master the art of ambidexterity

What proved helpful for the plant engineering firm AZO? For the company, which specialises in automated raw material feeding, a generational change is on the horizon alongside all the economic and technological challenges. Senior CEO Rainer Zimmermann and his son Lukas, who has also been CEO since early 2026, are shaping the transformation process together.

Rainer Zimmermann took over the company in 1990 together with his brother. As co-CEOs, they ran it hierarchically. In 2018, his brother Robert retired – and the younger brother began to consider a new leadership model. “Social scientists said at the time: if you want transformation, you must turn those affected into stakeholders. But try turning 700 affected employees – who were used to doing what they were told – into active participants,” recalls Rainer Zimmermann.

Eventually, staff were invited to collaborate on four projects tackling challenging topics. 200 accepted the invitation, supported by project owners, project coordinators and a Project Management Office (PMO). Meanwhile, what was defined at corporate level as part of our comprehensive strategy process is now being implemented through concrete measures in our subsidiaries worldwide. Lukas Zimmermann, who has been with the company since 2023, explains: “Employer branding, for example, means something completely different in Thailand than it does in Germany. The HR department there has to tailor the project to local circumstances.”

Lukas Zimmermann also emphasises the concept of ambidexterity – mastering two conflicting demands simultaneously. Exploitation – such as optimising existing processes and ensuring stability – and exploration – such as innovation and responding flexibly to change – must coexist. “For us, this means working as efficiently and effectively as possible in our day-to-day operations, in line with tried-and-tested methods, whilst at the same time strategically developing the company through transformation projects.”

AZO has already completed numerous projects, such as the development of a management toolkit designed to help develop skilled staff into managers. A comprehensive IoT strategy has been drawn up and a service concept for raw material analysis has been developed. Lukas Zimmermann describes the latter as “a major initiative aimed at offering customers even greater benefits. “We identify the optimal raw materials for the end product specified by the customer.”

AZO would have had to tackle all of this even within a traditional organisational structure. Now, however, those directly affected have taken matters into their own hands because they have become active participants. Lukas Zimmermann concludes by summarising: “Transformation is not embedded through new terminology, but through new habits. And that is precisely where we see how ambidexterity is truly put into practice.”

A young man wearing a headset on stage at the Expert Forum.
Lukas Zimmermann, who has also been CEO of AZO since January, explains how transformation projects can be implemented without neglecting day-to-day business.
The moderator (left) is standing whilst the five gentlemen seated on chairs are discussing.
Following their presentations, the participants on the panel discussed the pressure to innovate, the importance of value creation, challenges posed by international competitors and other aspects of transformation.

What will ensure the future viability of the European mechanical engineering sector?

Key takeaways from the panel discussion at the ‘Future of Processing’ forum:

Johannes Schmid-Wiedersheim, VDMA: “We are living in a productive era, precisely because the pressure is mounting. As a result, there is a great deal of innovation taking place within companies once again.”
Dr Urs Herding, Herding Filtertechnik: “Transformation is never an end in itself but is driven by the need to approach value creation differently.”

Lukas Zimmermann, AZO: “In our view, transformation can only truly succeed if those affected are made into active participants.”
Fabian Schünke, Herding: “We must preserve what we earn money from today whilst at the same time focusing on tomorrow and on innovation. This conflict is not a problem; it is the solution.”

Rainer Zimmermann, AZO: “We will have to change. Anyone who focuses solely on the hardware will lose out. Plant operation and automation are the key challenges if we are to stand up to our Asian competitors.”

Lukas Zimmermann, AZO: “Alongside our traditional plant engineering, robotics, autonomous transport systems, and digitalisation must find their place in integrated process chains. We Europeans are strong at integrating things. That gives me confidence.”

Dr Urs Herding, Herding: “There are incredibly innovative companies in Europe, not only in terms of products but also in terms of corporate organisation. This can unleash a level of agility, flexibility and innovative strength that really gives us a competitive edge.”

Author

Ulla Reutner
Dr. Ulla Reutner
Chemist and freelance specialised journalist